jamesdiddams.org

James Diddams

Welcome to the Diddams blog, home of all my writing on Politics, Theology, Economics, Art and Philosophy.

2023 Providence Christianity and National Security Conference at the Army and Navy Club in Washington, DC October 26th and 27th. © George Goss

My Writing

ABOUT

Hello! My name is James Diddams and I am the Managing editor of Providence Magazine, a publication of the Institute on Religion and Democracy (IRD), a think tank based in Washington, DC. I’m an aspiring writer/academic with a broad inter-disciplinary area of interest at the intersection of philosophy, theology and social science. I’m also an Anglican (ACNA) Christian.

I was born and raised in Seattle and graduated from Wheaton College (IL) in May, 2020 with majors in Philosophy, Art History and Economics as well as minors in Math and Political Science. Then, in the Fall I was a Fellow with the John Jay Institute, where my full-time job for a semester was living in a mansion with 7 other 20-somethings and reading great books of the Western canon. I worked at the IRD for all of 2021, leaving in 2022 but then returning in 2023 to edit Providence.

I consider myself at the beginning of a great journey of learning across all of the disciplines I’m interested in. I have plans for spending a significant amount of my life in graduate school in the future, but for now am mostly focused on building a portfolio of writing.

Citations

According to a Mercatus Center paper published last year by Weifeng Zhong, Christos Makridis and James Diddams, “The eight presidents since 1976 have declared a total of 64 national emergencies under the National Emergencies Act, 35 of which are still in effect to this day and most of which outlasted their motivating emergencies.” The oldest of the 35, “Blocking Iranian Government Property,” was declared in 1979. I was 14 years old.

Provocatively entitled hit pieces, putting Wheaton College under public scrutiny, have become a novel bromide in the era of evangelical fragmentation… James Diddams’s piece is [different] because it hails from an institutional insider, a recent graduate. Reproofs like this warrant more than callous dismissal. They ought to be heeded.